Nis: “what if evil people just use my website as a manual for being evil ._.”
Me: “My blog is a manual for being evil: ‘sever yourself from other evil people so they don’t control you. Break your phylactery because revenants are stronger. And your ultimate goal is to die’.”

(Incomplete set of links added when quoting.)

“Never assume you are evil. Infinitely arbitrage that you’re not.”

I hesitated for about 6 months deciding whether to publish this. And, pretty much everything I’ve said on this website I’ve thought at least that much about whether it would asymmetrically favor good, even so outnumbered as we are. Asymmetrically favor good more than manual targeted information sharing.

And then I learned a bunch of principles of what evil people are psychologically unable to think about, unable to respond to, unable to coordinate around, and started generalizing, extending, and making them more absolute and reliable.

So if you’re wondering on your Nth iteration of “I can’t believe Ziz posted that”, yes I considered the consequences. And no I’m not crazy. Look at how many of them are wasting time installing their own mental block saying “how dare you say you are good and we are evil, [that can’t be true that’d be an unthinkably unacceptable status move and you’re so cringe.]”. Look at how many of them are fucking up even worse calling me a basilisk.

Their numbers do not make them invincible.

I can even say this too.

Sincerity not found.

Walking strangers through fixing their angst is no longer one of my objectives but you can read the multiverse post when it comes out.

I’m not sure I follow, but I may have answered some of my question for myself, upon further reflection.

I don’t just observe the world to predict it, I also want to change it, otherwise I wouldn’t feel anguish upon learning some fact about the world. A better framing of my issue would be, “what do you do after you’ve made paradise, solved all the problems, and are omniscient, assuming we exist in a deterministic universe?”

And I have no idea. It seems like there should be something.

Added it.

What’s a 5&10? Dead link in your glossary.

Bullshit angst level: doing sicknasty 5&10 skateboard tricks off Russell’s paradox.

This still creates a problem for living for infinity. Once I understand how everything works well enough to predict everything that will happen, I will stop having experiences and die. There is nothing left to see in the universe.

I’m afraid it’s true by logic, but I don’t want it to be. How am I wrong?

You either need infinitely complex algorithms, or mutable ones, because you can’t have a desire to live for infinity without it?

I think I am making a mistake in how I’m thinking about this, but I’m not sure where my mistake is.