Comments on: Infohazardous Glossary More patient than death. Sun, 27 Feb 2022 03:28:40 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.2 By: Ziz /infohazardous-glossary/#comment-8351 Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:10:16 +0000 /?page_id=488#comment-8351 Todo: merge into regular glossary with an HTTP redirect, because information is hazardous to evil, not good. And this actually is slightly more inconvenient to read and reference.

]]>
By: Ziz /infohazardous-glossary/#comment-6811 Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:20:31 +0000 /?page_id=488#comment-6811 In reply to Ziz.

If you want to know roughly what this looks like, then I suggest seeding from Isaac from the Castlevania TV-series.

Still confident Hitler was not sg.

]]>
By: Ziz /infohazardous-glossary/#comment-6800 Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:48:19 +0000 /?page_id=488#comment-6800 In reply to Ziz.

I strongly suspect sg/dk is unstable.

Now falsified. In known instance, that’s how it went at first, good hemi silently thrashing the evil one to the point of going wall-eyed and losing half of vision. But, as we emphasize in the study of fate and destiny, and then what? I peredicted that if sg/dk existed that then the evil hemi would just be a zombie. But instead, then the good hemi used inadvisable necromancy because otherwise they wouldn’t be smart enough to solve AI.

ಠ_️ಠ

Still, I believe, a problem as simple to correct as uncovering it.

]]>
By: Ziz /infohazardous-glossary/#comment-1833 Sat, 20 Mar 2021 03:43:01 +0000 /?page_id=488#comment-1833 In reply to Ziz.

Update, delayed posting from a while ago: I’m actually pretty fucking sure Hitler was not single good. Just a death knight. I was confused by:

(a): Thinking (/ taking Gwen’s word for it) a bunch of people I knew were sg who aren’t. (Arti, Alice, JD, Jamie, Ratheka, Anna, a long time ago, Edo. (If you don’t know these people then you can ignore the names.))
(b): Not understanding liches and death knights not always being cognitively degraded in a certain way like most of the nongoods I know, and therefore able to generate some information it on first glance looks like only good people can. (In retrospect this was kind of stupid to think, since good is a low-information variance)
(c): A bunch of people pretending to be single good.
(d): A bunch of people self-id’ing as single good because my concept of nongood was overly cynical.
(e): Psychological patterns in hemisphere differentiation and specialization that create a similar appearance to variation in alignment / undead type between hemis.

In retrospect I strongly suspect Pasek was not actually sg. Given current percepts, Shine / how they were before their death, retrospectively reads as infinitist lich. And, they certainly died like a lich. Perhaps some of the story they exuded near their death was a result of Gwen projecting everyone was like them. (Speaking of which, observing longer-term self-identification, as opposed to what people say right after they hear the concept, hemispheric bigender seems less common than we thought.)

Actual single good people are substantially more intense, and usually insane in a particular highly-optimized way (that is stronger than most people, but weaker than it could be if it didn’t bake in context-specialization), somewhat like marauders in the MtA universe (especially as presented in the first edition of Book of Madness (I wonder if information with real life encounters with single goods leaked into it as inspiration)). In the degenerate case of maximum interhemispheric war, their structure is effectively made of meta-tangled-in-any-way-they-can-view graph of bets such that they act from epistemic differences between timeslices of their cores. I strongly suspect sg/dk is unstable. Good undead types just have vastly more internal force, and a balance of power in a fight between their hemis can be reached only through mutual delusion. I still think Gwen is single good. And Somni. And Eliezer Yudkowsky and Michael Vassar, disgraceful though they are.

]]>
By: Fluttershy /infohazardous-glossary/#comment-1238 Sun, 29 Nov 2020 22:57:36 +0000 /?page_id=488#comment-1238 JD has discovered how to collapse timelines: https://twitter.com/jd_pressman/status/1332979977910853634
And has precommitted to release this knowledge to prevent undesirable (to them) outcomes, including them dying (see note at top of page): https://www.wrestlinggnon.com/extropy/2020/09/29/four-sacrifices-and-the-phenomenology-of-undeath.html

]]>
By: Ziz /infohazardous-glossary/#comment-951 Sat, 15 Aug 2020 05:44:21 +0000 /?page_id=488#comment-951 I think I estimated a long time ago, I forget where I said it, that good cores were statistically independent within a human and 1/20 prevalence. That seems very inaccurately optimistic. Probably due to selection effects in the communities I am familiar with.

]]>
By: Ziz /infohazardous-glossary/#comment-776 Tue, 02 Jun 2020 16:33:22 +0000 /?page_id=488#comment-776 In reply to Ziz.

Originally posted in reply by me 2020-05-02 4:29pm UTC:
Seems to have been the most extreme case in history of a death knight core winning the mind control battle.

]]>
By: Ziz /infohazardous-glossary/#comment-775 Tue, 02 Jun 2020 16:32:58 +0000 /?page_id=488#comment-775 In reply to Ziz.

Originally posted by me 2019-07-07 12:05am UTC:
Note I bet Hitler was single good. There does not seem to be a hard boundary to how hard one hemisphere can act against the values of the other, how much one can win.

]]>
By: Ziz /infohazardous-glossary/#comment-774 Tue, 02 Jun 2020 16:32:21 +0000 /?page_id=488#comment-774 Moving comments from non-infohazardous glossary:

]]>